Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: US firms 'tried to lie' over GM crops, says EU



In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jim Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Bruce Sinclair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jim Webster"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >"Bruce Sinclair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> >message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jim Webster"
>> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >"Bruce Sinclair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>in
>> >> >message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jim Webster"
>> >> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> US firms 'tried to lie' over GM crops, says EU
>> >> >> >they either lied, or they didn't. If you try to lie, it means you
>> >> >> >inadvertently tell the truth by accident
>> >> >>
>> >> >> .. or were caught ? ... watergate anyone ? :)
>> >> >
>> >> >but no one has actually shown what the lies were, can anyone provide
>> >quotes
>> >> >from what the companies said, not what green organisations say that
>they
>> >> >said?
>> >> I make no staement as to whether there were lies or no. Surely the
>> >> proof of lies involves getting caught telling porkies ?
>> >
>> >did the teachers who taught my mother that the atom was the smallest
>thing
>> >that existed and was indivisible lie? Remember she was at school in the
>late
>> >30s early 40s
>>
>> Depends ... did they know that what they said was wrong when they
>> said it ?
>look at the dates. She was taught before the splitting of the atom was
>known. 

.. tho some had theorised that it was possible. Perhaps ..... "the 
atom is currently the smallest thing known" would have been closer ? 
Seems to me that anyone teaching science ought to say "this is the 
current theory" and/or "we currently believe this to be true". 
Uncertainty should be part of science from the start.

>It was a secret. Basically is the information isn't available, and
>you state what is thought to be true at the time, how can you be lying?

Quite so .. that still leaves the possibility of plausible deniability 
though :) :)

Bruce

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to 
think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone´s fault. 
If it was Us, what did that make Me ? After all, I´m one of Us. I must be. 
I´ve certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No-one ever thinks 
of themselves as one of Them. We´re always one of Us. It´s Them that do 
the bad things.         <=> Terry Pratchett. Jingo.



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.