
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Don suggested: <This creates a handling problem as pilot may not realize he is on back side of lift curve (also sometimes called back side of power curve, or region of reversed control). If the aircraft is in this region (past point of max CL) continued aft stick causes lift to decrease, craft to sink more rapidly. Only way to get out of it is to LOWER nose, counter-intuitive.> I don't think it's proceeding beyond Cl(max) that's the issue here - surely it's a Cl/Cd issue. Glide angle is simply the vector sum of the ratio of net lift (lift plus any component of thrust) to net drag (drag minus component of thrust parallel to velocity vector). Once past (Cl/Cd)(max) further increases in alpha might boost Cl but the corresponding increase in Cd is greater, so the glide angle (and hence the sink rate) increases. Hence low-aspect ratio deltoids require phnomenal amounts of power to fly at the very low speeds that the high-alpha capability of the configuration permits. All aircraft display this characteristic to some extent although it's far more pronounced on low aspect-ratio configurations; its the resultant of different forms of drag that vary differently with airspeed. Form drag increases with airspeed and induced drag decreases with airspeed, so there is a minimum total drag airspeed (at which in principle form drag equals induced drag). This airspeed is the speed for maximum rate of climb, being the condition in which the minimum amount of power is required to oppose drag and thus the maximum amount is available to oppose gravity, and in simple cases it usually occurs at around root-two times the stall-speed for the configuration. It should theoretically occur at EXACTLY root-two time Vs, but factors like the vertical component of thrust when the fuselage is rotated to achieve the required alpha confuse the issue in any real-world case, so it becomes an approximation. On a recent Discovery programme (take the health warnings as read) on privately-owned Migs in the USA an american Mig-21 owner stated that it was an "energy management" aeroplane which required afterburner for any kind of manoeuvering - even comparatively gentle turns. Even though the source was a Discover programme I wouldn't be that surprised if it was true. Peter D Rieden
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |