
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Its true what you say about the big dish, But you forgot to say you cant see what you want on a different TV in the same house. I pay about 100 a month for all channels on 4 TVs in the house . Martin Poles "4dtvman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Marc A. Leckstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > I have been a happy Directv subscriber for three years now, but > > recently I have become concerned as to my local cable company's > > ability to provide more programming. > > > > When I originally signed up for Directv back in 2000, the program > > offerings were far superior to anything my local cable provider > > (Comcast) had. There simply was no comparison. Directv had more > > movie channels.... > > > > Now however, I am discovering that Comcast has moved ahead in the > > programming department. > > > > My local Comcast currently offers the following movie channels: > > 20 HBOs, 8 Cinemaxs, 13 Showtimes, 5 TMCs, 7 Starz, 2 Flix, 2 Sundance > > Channels, 12 Encores > > > > They also offer 4 MTVs, 4 VH1s, C-SPAN's 1, 2 & 3 and the On Demand > > Service. > > > > Directv only offers the following movie channels: > > 8 HBOs, 3 Cinemaxs, 6 Showtimes, 2 TMCs, 4 Starz, 1 Flix, 1 Sundance, > > 8 Encores and 1 IFC > > > > Additionally they give: 2 MTVs, 2 VH1s, C-SPAN's 1 and 2 > > > > If I switched to Comcast Ditigal Cable, it would cost me $ 101.04 a > > month to get everything .... right now my total DirecTV bill is > > $94.98. > > > > So what is the real advantage of my staying with Directv at this point > > when I can get more channels on Cable for less than $10.00 extra > > month. > > > > My question is, when is Directv going to step up to the plate and > > start competing again? Why haven't new channels been added? They > > appear to have the room on the dial ... so where are they? > > > > I want to stick with Directv but I'm beginning to have second thoughts > > for the time in ages. > > > > Anyone have info? > > Here's the bottom line, Marc: Directv (ditto for Dish Network) is > using all of its extra bandwidth to try to eventually add local > channels for every market in the country. Your local cable company > only has to worry about the local channels in your area. Any time some > bandwidth becomes available, Directv uses it to add more local > channels instead of more HBOs, Cinemaxs, or MTVs. Just imagine how > many channels Directv could have if it didn't have to worry about all > of those local channels. This problem will only be resolved when they > put up enough spot-beam satellites. Spot-beam satellites will allow > Directv to divide the country into many geographical sectors and only > beam into each sector the local channels that geographically belong in > that sector. This will free up the bandwidth on their national > satellites for more channels like you are wanting. > > Right now, I still have one of those big ugly dishes (BUD). I've had > it since 1992 and plan keep it until one of the following happens: (1) > it breaks (they're very expensive to fix and besides, it's hard to > find people to repair them anymore), (2) I move (they're very > expensive to move and set up), (3) it's programming costs become more > expensive than cable or the small dish, or (4) it's channel selection > becomes less than that of cable and the small dish. The reason I'm > sticking with my BUD until then is because the channel selection and > prices cannot be beaten. I have all the channels you listed plus a lot > more at a price of about $70 a month.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |