
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Patrick Navin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dave wrote: > > > "Patrick Navin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>Dave wrote: > >> > >> > >>>"Jer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >>>snip.......... > >>> > >>> > >>>>You're welcome to drag out whatever documents you want, I really don't > >>>>care what they say. Whatever it is they say is not my business, rather > >>>>it's my attorney's business - and maybe, some day, yours as well. > >>>> > >>> > >>>perhaps but with comments like that in the last line and your so called > >>>knowledge of law, you will of course know that can be classified as > >>>threatning behaviour. > >>> > >> > >>At which mickey mouse law school would you learn shite like that Dave? > >>FFS you are a total mong. Until you leant the difference between > >>'behaviour' and 'language' you're going to struggle in a 1st grade > >>debating class let alone a court of law. > > > > > > I wouldnt have to make the decision in court, in fact that issue need not > > even go to court, the isp would do fine. Fortunately for jerK i aint a silly > > boy like you who just wants to argue and cause trouble. > > > Yet again Dave and reality are in different locales. Sheesh I can't > think of anyone on Usenet with les of a clue than you. Are you Phil Kyle? This fish aint biting, pack up your rod and go home
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |