Re: dvd recorder/player

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 07:52:25 -0600, Jer used
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to say...
 
>Kurt Hamster wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 22:44:44 -0600, Jer used
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to say...
>>  
>> 
>>>Oh, I get it.  You're now gonna try to make us believe you're not 
>>>subject to the international rules of copyright protections, aren't ya?
>> 
>> 
>> So you are the dumb fuck you purport to be.
>> 
>> To be covered by the copywrite of a particular recording then you must
>> be legally deemed to be in agreeance with the licensing of the product.
>> That agreeance is deemed to be complete on the purchase of that product
>> (it's an implicit part of the contract of sale).
>
>So, if you don't like how a copyrighted work is licensed, you're not 
>bound to the terms of it's sale?  Considering your agreement to it's 
>terms of sale were required to purchase, how is it you're not bound to 
>it's implicit obligations?

What does not liking something have anything to do with what I wrote?

>> 
>> Now if you are borrowing that product from a friend then you haven't
>> made a legal commitment to the licensing of that product, therefore you
>> are not in breach of that license, ergo you aren't in breach of
>> copywrite.
>
>Then explain how it is that having a copy of a copyrighted work without 
>permission from the copyright holder is not a breach of international 
>copyright law.

Duh. Read what I wrote again. obClue: "licensing".

>> 
>> Remember you fuckwit, we aren't all dumb yanks.
>
>Neither am I.

Dumb or a yank?