
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michelle Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Hank Shiffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > And he's preventing the original from being made available. > > > > That's another significant difference between Star Wars and > > > > SIASL. The uncut SIASL didn't displace the original published > > > > version. But Lucas is determined that his new and improved > > > > version be the only one available. > > > > > > The original was never released on VCR or DVD? > > > > The original was released on videotape and on laserdisc. The > > original trilogy is still available on tape. I discount tape > > versions; I won't buy anything on tape. It has not been released on > > DVD. > > Ok, then the situations are analogous; the original SIASL is out of > print, and so is the original Star Wars--but they both exist. Lucas is > not going to be able to recall all the VCR tapes and laser disks. Not true. According the Barnes & Noble, you can get both the original SIASL ($7.99 in paperback) and the uncut version ($15.25). Amazon lists only one version. But it's the original release, not the newer uncut version. So it is not analogous at all. To reiterate: the version of SIASL that most everybody read is still in print and still available. But the version of Star Wars that I saw in theaters isn't, at least on the preferred medium for watching a movie at home. -- Hank Shiffman http://www.disordered.org Have Opinion, Will Travel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, California
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |