Re: can you answer CHICAGO question?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 Dick Sidbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > So, I guess you think that the uncut version of Stranger in a 
> > Strange Land shouldn't have been published in the 1990s?
> > 
> Well it's apples and oranges to me but is the original version still 
> available?  

In libraries, I'm sure; last time I noticed it at a book store, only 
the more recent version was on the shelf.

> As far as I'm concerned, Lucas can revise all he wants to, but 
> ethically the "real" version of Star Wars (Not Episode IV) and the 
> other two movies should be available in high quality authorized 
> copies.

Why?  If he has total creative control, as some have suggested, then why 
shouldn't he make available only that which he believes he should make 
available?

-- 
Never play strip tarot.