
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
x-no-archive: yes weitrhino wrote: > > I tell you what....you hop into that rowboat and I'll be more than happy to > see that you get to your destination. > > weithrino > > "David Zeit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > x-no-archive: yes > > > > weitrhino wrote: > > > > > > TCI no longer exists. > > > > > > Of course there is a point to requesting a channel for carriage. But > don't > > > expect it to appear overnight. And don't expect a single request to > carry > > > much weight, however such requests are logged and do make an impression. > > > > > > Your alternative is to do nothing and get exactly that. > > > > > > weitrhino > > > > > > "Anti-Spametic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Is there any point in telling a cable company the size of Comcast or > TCI > > > > that you want them to add a channel they don't carry? > > > > > > > > Or are their carriage decisions based entirely on private deals > between > > > > themselves and the networks, and affecting all the systems they own > (ie. > > > > Cox won't carry Hallmark Channel in East Jesus, Tennessee unless > they've > > > > already decided to carry it nationwide on ALL their systems)? > > > > > > > > Why, sure. Heck we've been asking Comcast to add WGN for many years and > > maybe in 50 or 60 they will listen. IMO they don't give damn and will do > > whatever makes them the largest profit and the subscriber can go to Hell > > in a row boat. Would that be because you not only know the way but a short cut as well? I might ask if you work for Comcast or if you work for the Devil. But I'd be repeating myself.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |