
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
The problem with omnidirectional TV antennas IS that they are omnidirectional. They tend to pick up undesired signals as well as desired signals. That causes ghosting. "lbbs" <lbbs @dadffo.ca> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > btw: This antenna I saw at the Radio Shack is not just indoor antenna. It > cost $200 Can ($150 US) (also a cheaper version cost $120 Cand part 15-1634. > This is not one of those cheap indoor antennas. I is called an > indoor/outdoor Omnidirectional antenna. I it suppose to replace the old > style antenna, but it can also be mounted on the old antenna tower. The > nice thing about it is if you don't have a tower you can put it in your > attic and at least get better reception then good old rabbit ears. The > nice thing about it is you don't have to always rotate it in order to get > ideal reception (I find that a pain to always rotate the old antenna). > That is why it is called omnidirectional antenna. > > > "Brenda Ann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "lbbs" <lbbs @dadffo.ca> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I am trying to improve my TV signal. right now I have an old (made in > > > 1995) amplifier that is connected to an TV antenna (aprox 25ft high) > > mounted > > > on my house. Right now I have RG59 Coax cable (75'ft) which I want to > > > replace with RG6 cable. My amplifier is rated at 2.5w and 0.025amp. > > I > > > would buy a newer amplifier, if I thought it would help my signal. I > > > looked at a new amplifier at Radio Shack and the rating system seamed to > > be > > > different now. It was rated at 10dB and I believe it mention > something > > > about frequency. I assume the higher the db value means more > > > amplification. Will a 9dB amplifier do just as good as a 20dB > > amplifier. > > > What is the highest value that would be safe for my TV? They could > not > > > explain it to me at the store. > > > > First off, you don't want an inside amplifier, you want one that mounts on > > the mast next to your antenna. Radio Shack has one of these, I believe > it's > > catalog number 15-1108 (also 15-1109). These are not cheapies, and will > give > > very good results if you have any signal to start with. The reason you > want > > to go this way is because of cable losses, you end up amplifying the noise > > rather than the signal. As for the gain, that is adjustable on these > > mast-mount amps, so you can set it for no overload. TV tuners are capable > > of accepting a very wide range of signal levels.. from about -60dB to > +40dB > > and sometimes more, if there are no adjacent (e.g. 2 and 3 or 11 and 12) > > channels. > > > > > > > Second question is about buying one of those omnidirectional TV antennas > > > that look like a flying saucer. I believe they have a built in > > > amplifier. If I bought one should I use it in combination with my old > > > indoor amplifier 2.5W? Thanks a lot for your help. > > > > > > > Don't bother. Those antennas are junk from the word go. They have no real > > gain or directivity. They will do nothing for ghosting or very weak signal > > (most of the real signal gain is in the tuned elements of a real antenna). > > Buying the mast mount amplifier and switching to RG-6 will do you quite a > > bit of good. I don't know what your current signal looks like, but if it's > > been watchable so far, you should notice a lot of improvement. If it's > been > > all snowy and ghosty, you should buy a new fringe antenna as well (it's > > recommended to replace television antennas every 5 years or so due to > > oxidation/corrosion of the element contacts). > > > > > > > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |