Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Another Cable Thief Arrested (by the Cable-Nazis)



Let us examine the obtuse response foisted upon us by Huck.

"Hü©k Hö§hïmötö !" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> What's the point of posting this?

It is immediately and abundantly clear that Huck, possibly an abbreviation
of Schmuck, has entirely and completely missed the point either through
thoughtlessness, an inherent imbicilic nature, genetic disfigurement, or
some other monumental failing of his cerebral cortex.  I'm leaning toward
the belief there is a strong combiniation at work.

> Ohhhhhhhhhhh,....run away, run away!

An excellent idea.  Perhaps Schmuck is not entirely dim after all.  Please
Mr. Schmuck, take your own advice and prove you have at least one redeeming
trait.

> Quick, let's disconnect our pirate cable box!
> When was the last time ANYONE saw a press release like this one before
now?

Mr. Schmuck assumes that because he is utterly bereft of any foreknowledge
of such press items they simply must not exist.  Mr. Schmuck is surely not a
member of Mensa, therefore it must not exist, either.  This is yet another
institution hopelessly beyond his grasp.

> The chances of getting arrested (OR charged) is zilch point shit.

I will refer Mr. Schmuck back to the original posting and then point out,
because he surely will remain blissfully unaware, that the possibility of
conviction and incarceration most certainly exists indeed.

> 90% of the time, these guys get caught is because they bragged to their
> neighbors (who are paying for service) that they (the braggart) are
getting
> it for free.

Perhaps Mr. Schmuck would enlighten us all with the source of his claim.
And may I yet again refer him to the original posting which states, "The
company has also fanned out a 50-person team of technicians going door to
door to match cable service with customer records."

> Like software companies worth billions (who can easily afford to lobby for
> personal laws), they CAN get away with this crap.

This is further evidence of Mr. Schmuck's whispy conceptualization of the
rule of law.  No entity need lobby to place a law against felonious theft of
service.  The real crime is the evident educational opportunities missed by
Mr. Schmuck during his formative years.  Sadly, without concerted effort on
his part, this crime will be it's own lifleong punishment as evidenced by
anything Mr. Schmuck has written to this forum.

>
> Nevertheless, they will NEVER come close to "capturing" 1/100th of those
> freebie grabbers.

Nor need they, Mr. Schmuck.  The march towards a total digital platform
continues.

> RIP THOSE BASTARDS OFF EVERY CHANCE YOU GET!!!!
>

Yes, Mr. Schmuck has revealed a great deal about his character, or lack
thereof.  I am in full realization that a community consists of many people
with many views.  This in no way constrains me from wishing to rise above
the fart joke mentality Mr. Schmuck displays with such immense amplitude.
Such an all encompassing lack of cognitive skill can be easily found in any
fellow, such as Mr. Schmuck, who may drop his pants and still be able to
count only to twenty.

weitrhino





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.