Re: AA Does it Again!

No, it doesn't.  The article used "hitting" as the way the flight attendant
put it, but what ACTUALLY HAPPENED was "tapping" ergo, a huge
misunderstanding.

If you're going to play word games,  make sure who is quoted in an article
as saying what.


"mrt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Schultz wrote:
> > mrt wrote:
> >
> >>None wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>You're purposely ignoring the key points, and, you're welcome to go out
onto
> >>>the AP and find the follow up articles yourself.  The FBI investigation
> >>>clearly found that it was a MISUNDERSTANDING, and that the old woman
> >>>basically never "hit" anyone, stating "It was more like a pat"  which
is far
> >>>from hitting.  Get it?
> >>
> >>The FBI spokeswoman CLEARLY said [yada yada yada] <...>
> >
> >
> > Give up You lose. Everybody sees you're wrong.
> >
> > \\P. Schultz
>
> He said the old woman didn't hit the FA.
> The FA spokeswoman, from the article the he posted, used the word
"hitting".
> So, if he was trying to prove his point, that article certainly says the
> opposite.
>