Re: FLATTEST im

Guess I should read all the articles first ;-) Yes, that's what I use.

-Andrew

MJuric wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:04:26 GMT, MJuric wrote:
>
>
> > On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:53:01 -0700, Andrew Halperin
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I've used TOPO USA quite a bit. Not exactly the most accurate DEM's (digital 
> > > elevation model) but pretty darn close. If you get the topo quads, you'll get 
> > > even better accuracy.
> > >
> > > If you're looking for a specific course, let me know. I may (big maybe) have it 
> > > done already.
> > >
> > > -Andrew
> >
> >     I'm actually looking for something I can route the regular
> > courses we do for our tri club and post them online so people know
> > what to expect. I looked at the TOPO USA stuff but if memory serves it
> > was around 1200$. A little out of my range for a nicety to put on our
> > web site.
> >
> > ~Matt  
>
>
>         Ok maybe I was on Crack the last time I looked. Is this what
> you use?
>
> http://www.delorme.com/topousa/
>
> If so I could probably handle 99$
>
> ~Matt
>
>
> > > MJuric wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 13:26:43 -0700, Andrew Halperin
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > While I have to agree (done it a few times) that IMFL is one of the flatter 
> > > > > courses out there, it's not completely flat. After all is said and done I bet 
> > > > > you do close to 700-900' of climbing. I'm going to map this out sometime on topo 
> > > > > or use a local gis system to find out for sure.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of TOPO, any suggestions on decent, cheap software for
> > > > mapping eleveations etc?
> > > >
> > > > ~Matt
> > > >
> > > > <Snip>
> > > >
> > > > > -Andrew
> > > --
> > > Andrew F. Halperin  - boulder, co

--
Andrew F. Halperin  - boulder, co