Re: FLATTEST im

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:04:26 GMT, MJuric wrote:

>On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:53:01 -0700, Andrew Halperin
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I've used TOPO USA quite a bit. Not exactly the most accurate DEM's (digital 
>>elevation model) but pretty darn close. If you get the topo quads, you'll get 
>>even better accuracy.
>>
>>If you're looking for a specific course, let me know. I may (big maybe) have it 
>>done already.
>>
>>-Andrew
>
>       I'm actually looking for something I can route the regular
>courses we do for our tri club and post them online so people know
>what to expect. I looked at the TOPO USA stuff but if memory serves it
>was around 1200$. A little out of my range for a nicety to put on our
>web site.
>
>~Matt  

        Ok maybe I was on Crack the last time I looked. Is this what
you use?

http://www.delorme.com/topousa/

If so I could probably handle 99$

~Matt

>
>>
>>MJuric wrote:
>>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 13:26:43 -0700, Andrew Halperin
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>While I have to agree (done it a few times) that IMFL is one of the flatter 
>>>>courses out there, it's not completely flat. After all is said and done I bet 
>>>>you do close to 700-900' of climbing. I'm going to map this out sometime on topo 
>>>>or use a local gis system to find out for sure.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Speaking of TOPO, any suggestions on decent, cheap software for
>>> mapping eleveations etc?
>>> 
>>> ~Matt
>>> 
>>> <Snip>
>>> 
>>>>-Andrew
>>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>-- 
>>Andrew F. Halperin  - boulder, co
>>
>