Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: FLATTEST im



On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:53:01 -0700, Andrew Halperin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I've used TOPO USA quite a bit. Not exactly the most accurate DEM's (digital 
>elevation model) but pretty darn close. If you get the topo quads, you'll get 
>even better accuracy.
>
>If you're looking for a specific course, let me know. I may (big maybe) have it 
>done already.
>
>-Andrew

        I'm actually looking for something I can route the regular
courses we do for our tri club and post them online so people know
what to expect. I looked at the TOPO USA stuff but if memory serves it
was around 1200$. A little out of my range for a nicety to put on our
web site.

~Matt  

>
>MJuric wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 13:26:43 -0700, Andrew Halperin
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>While I have to agree (done it a few times) that IMFL is one of the flatter 
>>>courses out there, it's not completely flat. After all is said and done I bet 
>>>you do close to 700-900' of climbing. I'm going to map this out sometime on topo 
>>>or use a local gis system to find out for sure.
>> 
>> 
>> Speaking of TOPO, any suggestions on decent, cheap software for
>> mapping eleveations etc?
>> 
>> ~Matt
>> 
>> <Snip>
>> 
>>>-Andrew
>>>
>> 
>> 
>
>-- 
>Andrew F. Halperin  - boulder, co
>




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.