
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Just answer me one question - why couldn't roddick beat Federer convincingly ANYWHERE, let alone slam ? 6-4 3-6 7-6 is not convincing in my book. 6-7 3-6 3-6 is..... : ) -- Regards, Yury ------------------------------------ We can't necessarily rely on what the 'mass' of tennis fans think, since often the mass has stupid ideas. (C) Steve Jaros "Whisper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> сообщил/сообщила в новостях следующее: news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "VinB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > . > > > > > > It's probably lineball, but certainly I'm not going to argue when it's > > this > > > close. > > > > How is it lineball? Since you consider Graf to still be on top in 92/93 > when > > she won Wimbledon and Seles won the other 3 slams > > > > > > Eh? You're comprehension skills are sadly lacking..... > > Of course Seles was No.1 in '92 - but had Graf won a couple of extra points > in that FO final she woulda been real No.1.... > > '93 Graf won 3 slams & r/up in the other...... > > Just answer me 1 question - why couldn't seles beat Graf convincingly in any > slam.....? > > 6-2 3-6 10-8 is not convincing in my book. 6-2 6-1 is..... : ) > > > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |