
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Yahoo! is running a story citing a statement on Clijsters' Web site that because the Belgian Olympic Committee won't budge on its requirement that all athletes wear clothing made by its sponsor, Adidas, she won't be playing. Clijsters, as we know, has a contract with Fila. I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I think Clijsters is right to honor her contractual commitments (I don't really think she has much choice); I *also* thinik the fact that xOCs are signing such immovable sponsorship deals indicates what utter crap the claim is that the Olympics represent some kind of pure, uncontaminated, amateur sporting ideal. In practical terms, it's also just stupid: surely the BOC knows there are sports in which the athletes are often signed to exclusive contracts (though for the vast majority of athletes who represent Belgium in the Olympics I'm sure it's not an issue). Still, you'd think Clijsters could have negotiated an exemption for the Olympics. Surely it's in all her sponsors' best interests for her to play, no matter what she's wearing. All quite bizarre. Butis likely to make Navratilova/Raymond even more of a favorite. wg
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |