
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"john" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sampras was lacking tactically in your estimation? He's probably the > > smartest player I've seen - I can write pages if you want, but I presume > > it's obvious to most tennis analysts....? > > In my estimation, Sampras sure have more guns in his game than Roddick and > he has > weakness but rest of his game really cover it for him, What weakness did he have? You're nuts... Roddick unfortunate > does not > have enough tactical option in his game to cover up for his weakness that is > his > return of serve and his backhand , unlike Roddick Federer and Sampras can > play from > all part of the court, Roddick's main forte is from back of the court > although he can > dominate a player with his serve but he can't dominate them once he gets it > into a > rally. He beat the best baseliner in the world in straight sets in USO final. You're clueless.. > > It does. Fed has had 1 good slam in his career to date (no semis at any > > other slam except Wim this yr). Sure he's playing well right now, but for > > me it wouldn't be a huge surprise if he never wins another one... > > I would be surprise if he does not win a few slams, given the fact he is > most talented > player on tour, more talented than Roddick and Fererro, sure he is not > mentally strong > at the moment, but so is Roddick and Fererro. Mecir was the most talented in his day - he won jack-shit in slams.... your logic is faulty.... > > How many winners did you pick this year, in men's tennis you picked Roddick > to win > all the slams, that is not picking winners. I picked Ferrero to win FO & Roddick USO, also picked Henin's 2 slams.... If Federer start winning slams > are you going > to admit your inadequate knowledge of game.. If you can prove my knowledge is inadequate, sure......
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |