
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
I think that running is different than swimming. Track/cross country/road running athletes train and often compete at a high level all year long. In the height of the season, they go from meet to meet, maintaining their high level of performance. If the breakthtrough result doesn't come this week, there's a chance again in one or two or three weeks. Swimming doesn't work that way (for most swimmers). It tends to be a year (or at least 6 month) long training process which culminates in a taper and then a championship meet (again, think of Natalie Coughlin at world champs). If the taper is "off" or if there is an illness or just a bad biorhythm, the whole 6 months of training has more or less just gone by and the swimmer is left holding the bag. It doesn't need to be a gold medal; in most cases, the swimmer is happy to drop times. But, train for a whole year (where "training" is much more arduous than in almost any other sport) and the improvement just doesn't come...it's pretty tough. With the passage of time and maturity, the importance of the "process" is appreciated, as described by Terry in recounting his own college career, but it is very tough at the time. It's why I called it "the cruelest sport"...or close to it. From: Ross Bogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>The big meets are fun. We focus toward them when planning our training schedules. We do our best at them. A few of us even win medals. But they're not the reason for the sport. >>I know you understand all this. You are "Runnswim", after all. The same arguments can describe both of your sports. >>I also know you're thinking of all those poor 7-year-olds swimming lap after lap in winner-gets-all programs.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |