
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Phil Earnhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > If all wheels maintained constant contact with the ground, it might be > a reasonably accurate way to measure speed. But they're obviously not. Good point, would work well only on downhill runs, or else would have to run an averaging algorithm. > Several devices use GPS for measuring speed and distance. Timex has > such a device; I believe that Garmin came out with a > speed-and-distance-only device this year. Others in this thread have pointed out the problematic performance of the Garmin and similar units. > As you said in the first message of this thread, you could have a > widget that kicked out ultrasonic pulses and measured speed/distance > based on the doppler shift of the echoes. That has been done; someone > made a widget around 1988 for skiers. I just saw the description in > Outside magazine; I never saw any production units. I seem to remember some hobbyist magazine that did the same thing with the sonar unit from the old Polaroid SX-70 cameras. >... After all, the existence > of a patent doesn't imply the existence of a market for the device. That's why I said "LOL!!" There's nothing there that's really new--just where it's applied. Late model motor vehicles have rotation-rate sensing going on all over--crankshaft, brake rotors, etc... (I don't get why so many still have a mechanical speedo cable though...?)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |