
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Lorrie Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Oksana Baiul seems to be well along the road to recovery. > > She looked much steadier in both programs and it was so nice to > see her skate without having a breakdown (phew). I wonder how many women, > pro or eligible, are faster on the ice than she is. Maybe none. I was thinking the same thing. All those years she was wandering around the ice like a lost diva caused me to forget how fast she could be when she's on. > Even in a not-so-good Browning program, the footwork shines. I > went "grr" when they talked about how he learned from Scott Hamilton. > This blatant construction (as far as I can tell, with Browning's > permission) of Browning as secondary to Hamilton has always annoyed me. > Browning's footwork is better and IMO it's not even close, and most of it > is unique and couldn't possibly have been learned from Hamilton. There > are major areas in which Hamilton is better -- competitive nerves (and > record) and triple lutz, for example -- but footwork isn't one of them. Again, I was thinking the exact same thing. Aside from being great entertainers, Browning and Hamilton are nothing alike. That should be a *good* thing, right? --Ruth
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |