
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Kees Echo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oh, so I snipped the part where you explained how important you excuse > was to your original argument in addition to your subsequent > explanation of where it left your argument now that the excuse was no > longer valid? See that's why you'll never come up to scratch in rugby circles Cuddles, you just don't understand the game. Everyone else would be able to put two and two together and get something approximating four - not our Cuddles, he's fucked when his shoes are on. Fuck i don't know why i bother, but if i can bring one more moron to a better understanding of the game then i suppose my labours won't have been in vain. The Crusaders beat the Waratahs at home - just like they *always* have. Reuben led them to a record win. That they didn't win *away* from home is of no consequence - the only results you can compare is the home ones. Yes, you're right Canterbury did win away in 99, but it was an aberation as the results in 97, 01 and 03 have shown. If Canterbury lose at home in 04 then you may have a point, but at the moment Thorne's record still stands as an enviable one. Now fuck off and stop wasting precious bandwidth. > If you don't understand what I'm saying, just ask me rather than shoot > off on another path. We can try Q & A if it helps. Bwahahaha.......... like your lame attempt at the AB coach questionaire? It was enough to make me think your name was Moller. -- Mr Scebe "Personally i think you're a fucking idiot" ~Sean Connery in "The Rock"
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |