Re: The NZRU fucks NZ rugby good and proper

Bobs wrote:

> Peter Ashford wrote:
>
> > Kip wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:10:45 +1300, Peter Ashford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > You are aware of the bugetary difference between Otago and 
> > > > Auckland/Canterbury aren't you?
> > >
> > >
> > > Cry me a river. 
> >
> >
> >
> > I'd think you'd have your own one after how well your heroes did.
> >
> >
> > > You'd be a big fan of the salary cap then?
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes I am, but more for the smaller unions than Otago.
>
>
> LOL!! Smaller union?!? Otago is a S12 base for gods sake.

Ok, we'll do this slowly:

"More      for       the       smaller      unions"   (and here's the 
important part, pay attention now Bobsy Boy)    *THAN*    (did you get 
it?!?!?)   "Otago."

Notice that word 'than'?  _Contrasting_ Otago _with_ the smaller unions? 
 Okay, so they're *not* one and the same thing.  Understand?

No?  Okay, read it again a few times, SLOWLY.  Don't let those killer 
moths distract you again, stop touching yourself down there and pay 
attention, ok?