Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: HydroDynamic Lifting



Neil Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Carl Douglas wrote:
Neil Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
The topic turned to DIY adjustment of blades. Ewoud chimed in that
he has had some sucess decreasing the spoon size in this way with
some of his athletes.

CD took a different line, he said that small people should just
accept rowing short, thus accepting loss of lift, but instead go for
bigger blades still to minimise their "slippy stroke".

CD did what???!! Did he heck!



Did I interpret you incorrectly Carl? Here's the direct quote ............................................................................ ............................ Maybe, even, the weaker guy with the shorter (in angular terms) stroke who shoves all his work in at mid-stroke needs bigger blades than the more flexible but stronger rower who invests a rather higher percentage near the catch? ............................................................................ ..............................

taken from google groups.
http://snurl.com/38fp

And taken selectively, I'd say.  As a fuller quote shows:
  "So blade size should be a compromise of many factors.  Maybe,
   even, the weaker guy with the shorter (in angular terms) stroke
   who shoves all his work in at mid-stroke needs bigger blades than
   the more flexible but stronger rower who invests a rather higher
   percentage near the catch?
  "I would note, in passing, that it is perfectly normal for the
   lightweight & the super-heavyweight to use almost identical oars
   & rigs, despite their very different blade loadings.  But where's the
   science in that!?"

Since when has Weaker meant, or automatically implied, Smaller?

I was exploring a side issue to illustrate the main points under discussion, & I meant exactly what I said. That weaker person with a shorter stroke might, e.g., be an unfit guy of gut-restricted reach. Rowing is not only for athletic demigods & mad dentists, you know. ;^)

As my second paragraph had indicated, I've always advocated physique-specific rigging. Thus an athletic but small lightweight should row through a similar angular range as a taller person of similar athleticism, but at a higher rating in order to compensate for their shorter overall stroke. The shorter runner needs a higher cadence.

Cheers -
Carl
--
Carl Douglas Racing Shells        -
    Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
Write: The Boathouse, Timsway, Chertsey Lane, Staines TW18 3JY, UK
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tel: +44(0)1784-456344  Fax: -466550
URLs:  www.carldouglas.co.uk (boats) & www.aerowing.co.uk (riggers)




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.