
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Walter Martindale <URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > j brontey wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (marco) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ting.google.com>... > > > > > >>simulation. I would like to hear the opinion of people that actually > >>had see some practical proof that it is actually it doesn't work if > >>anybody has this experience. > > > > > > I think one of the tricky things with practical experience in this > > case is that everyone has the same practical experience regardless of > > what they believe. The principles of coaching a good catch, finish > > etc. probably aren't affected by understanding the physics behind the > > stroke so it's easy to have an opinion. Actually measuring lift etc > > in an oar can't possibly be cost effective, so your best bet is > > combining the theory with the practical observation that hydrofoils > > work. > > Ben > Ben, How you get so many brains? You smart man. Lift is probably > there, no matter how small it is, if it adds to propulsion, we should > seek ways to find it (in my case, help others find it). If we do > anything that adds even 1/2 of 1% to the overall speed of the boat, > we're putting someone 10 m ahead of where they'd be without the > intervention, over 2000 m. Finding it won't make any difference to boat speed, surely? You can only augment boat speed if you can find a way of exploiting lift to a greater extent than already achieved, and this will only be an advantage if nobody else does it... so if it is at all possible, it is unlikely to be discussed here or anywhere else, just demonstrated at the most important race. Allan Bennett --
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |