Re: To opponents of gay marriage

Hitman of Las Vegas wrote:
> Very true.  But what makes you say this?  I have seen literatuire
> on both sides of the issue, but all of it is dubious to me.  It's
> usually presented by an outlet clearly with a bias.  Nothing wrong
> with bias, but it does mute the impact of the studies.
> That is to say, gay rights groups come out with studies that support
> this position.  Anti gay rights groups come out with studies that are
> against that position.  To my untrained eye, neither set of studies
> look more credible than the other, so my position on that genetic
> predisposition is, naturally, 'we don't know yet.'
> So is your conclusion based on particularly compelling evidence (and
> again, evidence is on all sides of this issue), instict, or something
> else?
 No, my conclusion isn't based on compelling evidence, it's just what
makes the most sense to me from what I've listened to and read.  I
should have said, "I think most homosexuals are born that way" instead
of stating it like it was a proven fact.