Re: To opponents of gay marriage

"Hitman of Las Vegas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:58:49 -0800, Mark Stringer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I believe most homosexuals are born that way although people
> >can probably become gay/bi through environmental experiences/
> >influences.  I not sure how a homosexual would asked for
> >forgiveness for being born attracted to the same sex. . .
> >"I'm sorry you made me gay, please forgive me."?
>
> Very true.  But what makes you say this?  I have seen literatuire on
> both sides of the issue, but all of it is dubious to me.  It's usually
> presented by an outlet clearly with a bias.  Nothing wrong with bias,
> but it does mute the impact of the studies.
>
> That is to say, gay rights groups come out with studies that support
> this position.  Anti gay rights groups come out with studies that are
> against that position.  To my untrained eye, neither set of studies
> look more credible than the other, so my position on that genetic
> predisposition is, naturally, 'we don't know yet.'
>
> So is your conclusion based on particularly compelling evidence (and
> again, evidence is on all sides of this issue), instict, or something
> else?

I disbelive in the "born that way" Theory because first and formost all my
gay friends find that a hillariously idiotic idea.

as for the second, i think that creates way to many issues. cause if their
is a gay gene then why6 not a pedophile gene, that means that people are no
longer responsible over their sex and sexuality and thats bad

third: Does that mean there is a gene that makes me be attracted to hot red
heads? I mean, if sex is about sexual attraction then we are doomed to one
type.. oh wait, no we aren't

it just doesn't make sense that gay sex would be genetic