
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?
- __From__: Jeremy Billones
- __Subject__: Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 02:53:35 -0600
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There is no 'penalty' if the injury would be the 4th 'time out'.
>any further injury 'time outs' for a team would result in a penalty
>if the running clock was stopped for the injury time out.
Ah, they do get one for free, then. Thanks.
--
Jeremy Billones
"Discussion is for the wise or the helpless and I am neither."
- Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?,
Harold Buck
- Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?,
bill bert
- Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?,
Joe Toth
- Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?,
Jim R.
- Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?,
Jim R.
- Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?,
Scott Taylor
- Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?,
Scott Taylor
- Re: [NFL] Colts-NE, Defensive Delay of Game?,
Binyamin Dissen