Re: Theisman is an idiot

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Harold Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Theisman is claiming that if the offense is guilty of delay of game 
>(actually a substitution infraction in this case, which I'm glad they 
>clarified, since the ball was snapped with 0:01 on the play clock), then 
>the play never took place and you therefore cannot call a facemask 
>personal foul on the defense after the whistle.
>
>Okay, now someone must have told him he's an idiot, because he's now 
>informing us that the personal foul is still enforced. Can someone make 
>him take a rules exam, please?

I was telling my wife the same thing, and I'm not even a football ref.
Patrick made up by saying nice things about Grier, after he handled a
replay review quite briskly.