Re: Defering in the NFL

"Guardenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Scott Taylor wrote:
> >
> > "Bill Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > I often suggest to those afflicted in the manner to which you refer having a
> > > glass stomach installed. Pulling ones head out seems difficult for them,
> > > perhaps you would be wise to suggest another "option" with which to view
> > > the world to your argumentative foil?
> >
> > I think I sorta like "glass rectum" better.  I has a certain ring to it.  :^D
> >
> > > Harold,
> > >
> > > Quit being so damn logical and to the point. It could kill the conversation.
> >
> > Harold is doing a nice job balancing himself on top of the fence.
> > He's ok there.
> >
> > But, if Guardenman is going to tell us what an Option is
> > according to Fed 3-2-3, then he's also going to use the
> > same rules reference to tell us what Defer is.  It's right
> > there in black and white, but he doesn't dare say so,
> > because he knows he'll get buried on the rebuttal.
>
>
>
> It's all in the context. There is no argument that Defer couldn't be
> called an option under the definition of the word. However in the
> context of rule 3-2-3 defer is not an option.

If it's not an option, then what is it?


> In rule 3-2-3 defer is postponing your choice of the options,
> until the second half.

If it's not an option, then what is it?


--  Scott