
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Alan Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Phil Earnhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 23 Nov 03 18:49:21 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug > > Norris) wrote: > > > > >>What would be the tradeoffs for goalies in having a small amount of > > >>rocker vs. having the skates totally flat? > > > > > >Completely flat skates would make turning much more difficult. > > > > Right. That's half of the generic answer to the tradeoff of rocker in > > skates. I was hoping for some *specific* information: what is the > > utility of turning ability for a goalie? What are the possible > > scenarios under which they would need to be turning while playing > > their position? > > > > Do you have an answer to my original question: how much rocker is > > actually present in goalie skates? > > None. The blades are completely flat. > > I say this having both played (a very little) goal, and having been a > skate sharpener. I was about to say the same. I've played goal since the early 1970's, all my skates have been perfectly flat but with a hollow, so you could turn. It was always worthwhile to have the front part of the blade hollow ground like a forward's and the rest (after 1") flat. The choice for may goalies was whether you wanted the flat skate ground cross-ways or like a forwards (without the hollow), which was straight. I preferred a hollow ground of 1" near the toe and the rest sharpened cross wise. I have a few goalie friends who don't like the hollow at the toe of the skate and went for a flat blade sharpened lengthwise. Sounds simple, doesn't it? :)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |