Re: NHL Edmonton vs Montreal

Charkstar wrote:

> "Black Jacque Shellacque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
>
> > Charkstar wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > "Black Jacque Shellacque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >      
> > >
> > > > Charkstar wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >        
> > > >
> > > > > No surprise that if LIEbrawls like the Doctor had their way, it would
> > > > >          
> be
>  
>
> > > > >          
> > > a
> > >
> > >
> > >      
> > >
> > > > > crime to even harbour lustful THOUGHTS about anyone under 30.
> > > > > Unless, of course, if was fag and fag.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >          
> > > > The problem Sharx is that you are talking about such thoughts in regards
> > > > to a 15 year old girl.  She's a kid, fer cryin' out loud, you are a 57
> > > > year old guy who is lusting after a 15 year old kid!  What would you
> > > > think if that were your daughter?  I'm sure you would be singing a
> > > > different tune.  You really are a pedophile, aren't you?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >        
> > > The age of consent is 14, cumbreath.
> > >
> > >      
> > So THAT makes it ok?  She is a kid you dumb ass.  You are a 57 year old
> > guy who is lusting after a kid who is 42 years younger than you.  And,
> > what you are talking about as legal here is ILLEGAL in much of the rest
> > of the world, including most of the United States where that age is
> > 16.   I thought you were smarter than to resort to some legal
> > technicality to justify your lusting after a kid.
> >    
>
> This is Canada and you fucking LIEbrawls have not yet succeeded in making
> mere thought a crime. That's what George Orwell so aptly wrote about.
>  

I am talking about the safeguarding of children, dumbass.  Not thought 
crimes.  And btw, I am not a liberal.  Get your facts straight before 
you start making accusations.

>  
>
> > >      
>
>
>