Re: NHL Edmonton vs Montreal

"Black Jacque Shellacque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Charkstar wrote:
>
> >"Black Jacque Shellacque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >>Charkstar wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>No surprise that if LIEbrawls like the Doctor had their way, it would
be
> >>>
> >>>
> >a
> >
> >
> >>>crime to even harbour lustful THOUGHTS about anyone under 30.
> >>>Unless, of course, if was fag and fag.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>The problem Sharx is that you are talking about such thoughts in regards
> >>to a 15 year old girl.  She's a kid, fer cryin' out loud, you are a 57
> >>year old guy who is lusting after a 15 year old kid!  What would you
> >>think if that were your daughter?  I'm sure you would be singing a
> >>different tune.  You really are a pedophile, aren't you?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >The age of consent is 14, cumbreath.
> >
>
> So THAT makes it ok?  She is a kid you dumb ass.  You are a 57 year old
> guy who is lusting after a kid who is 42 years younger than you.  And,
> what you are talking about as legal here is ILLEGAL in much of the rest
> of the world, including most of the United States where that age is
> 16.   I thought you were smarter than to resort to some legal
> technicality to justify your lusting after a kid.

This is Canada and you fucking LIEbrawls have not yet succeeded in making
mere thought a crime. That's what George Orwell so aptly wrote about.


>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>