Re: NHL Edmonton vs Montreal

Charkstar wrote:

> "Black Jacque Shellacque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
>
> > Charkstar wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > No surprise that if LIEbrawls like the Doctor had their way, it would be
> > >      
> a
>  
>
> > > crime to even harbour lustful THOUGHTS about anyone under 30.
> > > Unless, of course, if was fag and fag.
> > >
> > >
> > >      
> > The problem Sharx is that you are talking about such thoughts in regards
> > to a 15 year old girl.  She's a kid, fer cryin' out loud, you are a 57
> > year old guy who is lusting after a 15 year old kid!  What would you
> > think if that were your daughter?  I'm sure you would be singing a
> > different tune.  You really are a pedophile, aren't you?
> >    
>
> The age of consent is 14, cumbreath.

So THAT makes it ok?  She is a kid you dumb ass.  You are a 57 year old 
guy who is lusting after a kid who is 42 years younger than you.  And, 
what you are talking about as legal here is ILLEGAL in much of the rest 
of the world, including most of the United States where that age is 
16.   I thought you were smarter than to resort to some legal 
technicality to justify your lusting after a kid. 

>  
>
>
>
>