
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
I read a lot of things about Trent Dilfer on these newsgroups, some of which I even agree with -- that he is mediocre, or that he ran a relatively conservative offense with the Ravens -- but I'm also reading a lot of nonsense, so it's time to set the record straight. First, his career stats. I've broken it down into four groups. Tampa Bay 1994-1996 979 att., 529 com., 6066 yds., 17 TD, 43 int., 60.4 rating Tampa Bay 1997-1999 1059-588-6903-53-37, 77.6 Baltimore 2000 226-134-1502-12-11, 76.6 Seattle 2001-2003 294-169-2216-11-10, 79.7 Career passer rating 71.2 Dilfer joined a poor team in 1994 and became the full-time starter by the following year. He was 22-24 years old during the first stat grouping. Unsurprisingly, a green quarterback thrown into the NFL fray put up very poor numbers. The team improved dramatically during the next three years, as did Dilfer. He basically has maintained that same level of performance through his Baltimore and Seattle years. Contrary to widespread opinion, Dilfer has in fact been a very middling quarterback since 1997, not a poor one, at least statistically. Now for his win-loss record. I personally don't give this a lot of weight because W-L is a team statistic, but since there are many others who DO give it some weight I'll review it here. Dilfer is 51-43 career as a starter, .543, and remember that includes those early years with a bad Buccaneer team. During that same time the teams he has played for are 83-72, .535. Thus, the teams Dilfer has played for have a slightly higher winning percentage with him in the lineup than without him in the lineup. And of course, he won a Super Bowl as a starting quarterback. That fact is, Dilfer is in no way, shape, or form a poor quarterback. He has evovled into a competent, thoroughly middle-of-the-road NFL quarterback. He is practically the poster boy for middling quarterback.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |