
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 18 Nov 2003 10:34:01 -0800, Aaron Ginn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Steve Jaros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> Who's behind the "Parcells is the best coach ever" propaganda we've been >> hearning lately? Here's another example: >> >> http://www.msnbc.com/news/993258.asp?0dm=C22NN&0dm=C12VS >> >> Parcells wasn't even the best coach of the 1980s/early 1990s (Bill Walsh >> was). Nor was he the 2nd best coach of that era (Joe Gibbs was). > > How can anyone say Bill Walsh is a better coach than Joe Gibbs? Gibbs > teams played in the most brutal division in football for over a decade > going up against the Cowboys, Eagles, and Giants when all those teams > were great. Walsh's Niners played in the pathatic NFC West with > mediocre Rams and bad Falcons and Saints teams. Gibbs won Super Bowls > with *three* different QBs - two of whom were marginal at best (Doug > Williams and Mark Rypien). Walsh had one QB - arguably the best ever > - at that position for a decade. None of that divisional stuff matters much. Great teams are measured by championships. I haven't really given much thought about which of those two fine coaches were better. My dislike for the Redskins probably clouds my impressions somewhat, but I don't think the people who consider Walsh to be the better coach asinine. Isaac
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |