
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Krammerhead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jefferson N. Glapski wrote: > > "Jason Hoehn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>"Charles Beauchamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >>>Hah that must be how old the average Canoodian would be if they stayed > >> > >>past > >> > >>>3rd grade. Since it is obvious that you folks can't count past 100 > > > > (well > > > >>ok > >> > >>>you can count to 110 for your wrong sized football fields). > >> > >>The truth is, the imperial system is antiquated and makes no sense. There > > > > is > > > >>no rhyme or reason to any of it,... the Metric system is a nice, simple, > > > > and > > > >>very well concieved system of measure,.. the imperial sytem is not,... > > > > It's > > > >>a mess > > > > > > > > It's all arbitrary. Are you advocating that the CFL change from a 10 yards > > to make a first down to 9.144 meters to make a first down, Trudeau? > > > > If metric is so wonderful, why did Canuckians have it forced down their > > throat, costing several billions in direct costs and ongoing costs of > > billions of dollars since 90% of Canuckian trade is with a country that does > > not use metric. > > > > When metric was instituted back in the 70's the USA was also going to > convert. Then the US realized that it's population didn't have the IQ > possible to be able to understand the switch, so it chickened out. > > KH. > Hah. Ya right. Like it takes a higher IQ to count to 10....you maroons. v/r Beau
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |