
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"BlueBaggers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Jezza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > >> >Balme could have just offered a straight swap for Didak. > >> > >> Thats right, he could have, and could have also offered Buckley, > >> Tarrant, Fraser or Burns, and PA would have probably taken any of > >> them without hesitation. > >> > >> The point was that Collingwood didnt want to get lose any of their > >> best 20 players. whats wrong with that? > > > > Nothing at all...but they're not being remotely realistic if they > > expect to get a player of Stevens' calibre without giving up something > > better than Betheras/Molloy/McGough/Leon Davis and a very late first > > round pick. > > > > > > > > the only reason I can see that they didn't do it (which I have no problem > with BTW) is so that Collingwood didn't get another good player, thus > strengthening their team even more, which would make it even harder for > Port to win next year. That's part of it, and also Port didn't want players who are going to eat up salary cap space, but not be regular senior players.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |