
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 07:41:19 GMT, Colin Kynoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Zed Strange wrote: > >> On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 23:21:43 GMT, Colin Kynoch >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>Slight difference dude. The Father/son rule applies evenly to ALL clubs. The >>>>concessions only apply to a select few like the Brions. >>> >>>Tell me many players for West Coast, Fremantle, Adelaide and Port have >>>had children old enough to qualify? >> >> >> Doenst need to be. You obviously dont know the rule. >> >> All those clubs can choose from fathers that played for East >> Fremantle, Sturt, et al. They dont have had to play in the AFL at >> all. >> >>>It doesn't apply evenly to teams. >> >> >> of course. The interstate clubs have a wider selection of players to >> choose from. > >Well the ones from WA and SA possibly now what are the games requirements? about 10 above has the answer to that, but i guess your question is rhetorical. the answer to that is becuase they have a larger pool to choose from.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |