Re: Go The Lions

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JohnD.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Optional Identity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 22:19:18 +1000 "JohnD."
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Optional Identity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:20:32 +1000 "JohnD."
>> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >"Optional Identity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>message
>> >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> On Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:29:31 +1000
>> >> >> "JohnD." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >"±" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> "JohnD." wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > "±" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > He was forced off UseNet.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > What for ?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Wasting bandwidth and refusing to snip ?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> After having this picture outed, he had no other choice:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> http://tinyurl.com/6pas
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Jaaaysus ... what'dya have to go and send me there for.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I clean up very nicely, don't I?
>> >> >
>> >> >You're a glamour for sure
>> >>
>> >> Without the makeup I look a bit daggy.
>> >
>> >Hottie, no doubt.
>>
>> Absofuckinglutely!
>
>Are you OI or OI's frog ?

What a pair of pathetic lame froggers they are.