
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 23:32:16 GMT, Colin Kynoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >peterkip wrote: > >> "JohnD." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>... and it suits Collingwood just fine to encourage the AFL to accomodate >>>those poorer clubs. While you may be able to identify some benefit to some >>>other clubs, you cannot deny that Collingwood receive inequitable >> >> treatment >> >>>from the AFL. >>> >>>If you wanna harp on about the concessions that Brisbane receive at least >> >> be >> >>>honest enough to admit that Collingwood receive consessions as well. >>> >> >> >> What concessions? > >Father-son rule. how does Collingwood get more concessions than any other club? >More games in Vic than most other Vic clubs. Most? so what you are saying is that Collingwood dont get more concessions than any other club. Lets not forget that 4 Melbourne clubs choose to play home games in other states so you cant count that. Face Facts. all melbourne clubs play 4 or 5 interstate away games. So what you are really talking about here is 1 game. Hardly an unfair concession.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |