Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Life's good.



Larry de Silva wrote:
"Colin Kynoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Larry de Silva wrote:


"JohnD." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


"Larry de Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


"JohnD." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


"Larry de Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Slight difference dude. The Father/son rule applies evenly to ALL

clubs.



The


concessions only apply to a select few like the Brions.

Do you believe all the inequities should be ironed out of the game ?


No, this is impossible as long as you have a National comp. But a
concession/socialist system where a team wins 3 in a row is as bad as

the



opposite system where a team like Man United wins 3 in a row. Maybe the
answer is cutting the Brions $concessioins by half?




I await your posts calling for less-advantageous draws for Collingwood

...



Look if you look at it over the past few years, Collingwood's draw has

had



the lot. A few seasons ago we won all four of our interstate games so

travel



doesn't worry the pies. What happens is that all the poorer Vic clubs

want



to play us for the extra $ we generate through gate receipts. The AFL

only



responds to their requests to play us. Collingwood will not complain

about



any draw because at the end of the day, we have to beat good teams to

make



the finals anyway.

... and it suits Collingwood just fine to encourage the AFL to

accomodate


those poorer clubs. While you may be able to identify some benefit to

some


other clubs, you cannot deny that Collingwood receive inequitable

treatment


from the AFL.

If you wanna harp on about the concessions that Brisbane receive at

least


be


honest enough to admit that Collingwood receive consessions as well.



Look dude I was having a serious discussion with you but looks like you

have


only a secret agenda to discredit the 'pies. OR you cant read. I have

said


that it is IMPOSSIBLE to have an equitable comp but that any system that
purports to being equal and lets one team dominate for such a long

period


like the Brion's are, & will do over the next few years, has very
significant flaws in it I think. It is a bad reflection on the AFL when
$concession card holders like the Brion's win 3 in a row. WHO cares

about


draws for Collingwood or the other teams when come September, it all

becomes


totally bloody irrelevant when playing the Brions? No other team would

have


beaten the Brion's last Sat. Not a snowballs hope in hell.

Well collingwood certainly didn't they had too many spectators on the ground. They lacked heart, guts and any desire to win the game.

Sydney or Port would have put up a much better effort they at least
would have tried.



READ what I wrote FFF Colin. No other team would have beaten the Brion's last Sat. Not a snowballs hope in hell.

Whether they won by a point or 100, the Brion's would still have bloody won.
The $concession card holders are awesome.

We will never know how a team that played with guts determination and heart would have gone against Brisbane as it was Collingwood who played.


I suspect that the Swans may have won it had they made it.

Colin Kynoch




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.