Re: Life's good.

"Adam Simmonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Larry de Silva wrote:
>
> > "deker19" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Larry de Silva wrote:
> > >
> > > > "deker19" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Larry de Silva wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > "Colin Kynoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Larry de Silva wrote:
> > > > > > > > "bjs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>"Larry de Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message
> > > > > > > >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>>"JohnD." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message
> > > > > > > >>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>>"Larry de Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > message
> > > > > > > >>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>No. I hate unfairness even if you support it. A team
having
> > an
> > > > extra
> > > > > > > >>>>>$750,000 concession card to spend on its salary cap is
> > BLATANTLY
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>unfair.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>>>>Give Collingwood that money and we would have had at
least
> > two
> > > > flags
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>by
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>>>now.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>FACT.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>Funny how some people seem to think that by making a
statement,
> > and
> > > > then
> > > > > > > >>either following it with the word "fact" in capitals or, if
> > > > speaking,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > saying
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>the word in a slightly raised and empahsised voice, actually
> > makes
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >>statement factual.  I always thought that "actual" facts
made a
> > > > > > statement
> > > > > > > >>FACT!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No its all about YOU dude! If you choose to deny facts,
thats
> > your
> > > > own
> > > > > > > > reality, not mine. I clearly state that if Collingwood had
the
> > extra
> > > > $ &
> > > > > > > > assistance that the Brions have had over the past few years,
we
> > too
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > have won at least 2 flags by now! But when we win one it
wont be
> > as
> > > > > > > > concession card holders.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How did Collingwood come by Jason Cloke, Rhyce Shaw and
several
> > others
> > > > > > > on their list Larry?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And before you say it Jobe Watson at Essendon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Slight difference dude. The Father/son rule applies evenly to
ALL
> > clubs.
> > > > The
> > > > > > concessions only apply to a select few like the Brions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lazza
> > > > >
> > > > > The father/son rule applies to all clubs, but favours some clubs
far
> > more
> > > > than
> > > > > others.  They should chuck it out.
> > > > >
> > > > > deker19
> > > >
> > > > The Father/son rule has been there for many years with nearly every
club
> > > > benefiting. Even the Brions benefited with Brown. Different to the
pissy
> > > > bloody $concession cards that are given out to only a select few!
YOU
> > now
> > > > tell me which one is equitable dude?
> > >
> > > Strange.  You appear to be happy with "nearly" every club benefitting.
> > > So you're happy to accept a situation like this, hey?  Well, to answer
> > > your question... both are equitable to those teams that benefit - and
> > > both are inequitable to those teams that don't benefit.  Simple,
really.
> > >
> > > deker19
> >
> > Either you are really bloody thick or purposely missing the point. I'll
try
> > to explain this just once more. Very simply. Read carefully.
> >
> > The Father/son rules applies to ALL the AFL clubs. For those WA & SA
clubs
> > without the VFL history, the AFL recognises their local leagues. For
example
> > if a Bob Smith played for Swan Districts & accumulated over 100 games,
> > either West Coast or Freo can claim his son under the F/S rule. The
Swans
> > can claim the ex South Melb. players' sons. The Brions can clain the ex
> > Fitzoy players' sons. In SA & WA, it is up to the son to choose which
club.
> > Just like David Cloke played for both Richmond and Collingwood and Jason
> > Cloke could have gone to either Richmond or Collingwood. In fact
initially,
> > he wanted to go to Richmond but they did not want him, and Collingwood
did.
> > However that is another subject.
> >
>
> I think you will find the number of games for qualification is smaller for
Vic
> clubs.
> IIRC it is 50 games less for Vic clubs.


Wrong dude. The father has to have played more than 100 games.

Lazza


>
> >
> > The $concessions ONLY apply to a few interstate clubs, not all the AFL
> > clubs. THAT is not equitable. The Brions had an extra $700,000 this year
to
> > spend on its players. All the Victorian clubs did not. So YOU tell me
how
> > that is a fair system dude? One that leads an interstate club with a
> > $concession card to win three flags in a row, and they probably will end
up
> > with quite a few more over the next few years. Now unless you are a
Brions
> > fan, HOW can you support a unfair system like that which will prevent
YOUR
> > club from winning a flag for years dude? I just cant understand that
line of
> > thinking at all.
> >
> > So much for the other Victorian club fans hanging shit on Collingwood's
loss
> > but we did much better than them all season & was clearly the best Vic
team
> > in the Comp. This unfair system affects their clubs as well! Such brainy
> > supporters............they should ALL now support the Brions if they
enjoyed
> > their win over us so much!! Such passionless supporters! Thankfully, we
> > don't have them at Collingwood dudes.
> >
>