Re: Life's good.

<snip>

> Either you are really bloody thick or purposely missing the point. I'll
try
> to explain this just once more. Very simply. Read carefully.
>
> The Father/son rules applies to ALL the AFL clubs. For those WA & SA clubs
> without the VFL history, the AFL recognises their local leagues. For
example
> if a Bob Smith played for Swan Districts & accumulated over 100 games,
> either West Coast or Freo can claim his son under the F/S rule. The Swans
> can claim the ex South Melb. players' sons. The Brions can clain the ex
> Fitzoy players' sons. In SA & WA, it is up to the son to choose which
club.
> Just like David Cloke played for both Richmond and Collingwood and Jason
> Cloke could have gone to either Richmond or Collingwood. In fact
initially,
> he wanted to go to Richmond but they did not want him, and Collingwood
did.
> However that is another subject.
>
> The $concessions ONLY apply to a few interstate clubs, not all the AFL
> clubs. THAT is not equitable. The Brions had an extra $700,000 this year
to
> spend on its players. All the Victorian clubs did not. So YOU tell me how
> that is a fair system dude? One that leads an interstate club with a
> $concession card to win three flags in a row, and they probably will end
up
> with quite a few more over the next few years. Now unless you are a Brions
> fan, HOW can you support a unfair system like that which will prevent YOUR
> club from winning a flag for years dude? I just cant understand that line
of
> thinking at all.
>
> So much for the other Victorian club fans hanging shit on Collingwood's
loss
> but we did much better than them all season & was clearly the best Vic
team
> in the Comp. This unfair system affects their clubs as well! Such brainy
> supporters............they should ALL now support the Brions if they
enjoyed
> their win over us so much!! Such passionless supporters! Thankfully, we
> don't have them at Collingwood dudes.
>
> Lazza
>
Actually Lions are allowed an extra $600 000, Sydney had $750 000