Re: Life's good.

Larry de Silva wrote:

> "deker19" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Larry de Silva wrote:
> >
> > > "Colin Kynoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Larry de Silva wrote:
> > > > > "bjs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >>"Larry de Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>"JohnD." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > >>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>"Larry de Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > >>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>No. I hate unfairness even if you support it. A team having an
> extra
> > > > >>>>>$750,000 concession card to spend on its salary cap is BLATANTLY
> > > > >>
> > > > >>unfair.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>>>Give Collingwood that money and we would have had at least two
> flags
> > > > >>
> > > > >>by
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>>now.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>FACT.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>Funny how some people seem to think that by making a statement, and
> then
> > > > >>either following it with the word "fact" in capitals or, if
> speaking,
> > > > >
> > > > > saying
> > > > >
> > > > >>the word in a slightly raised and empahsised voice, actually makes
> the
> > > > >>statement factual.  I always thought that "actual" facts made a
> > > statement
> > > > >>FACT!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No its all about YOU dude! If you choose to deny facts, thats your
> own
> > > > > reality, not mine. I clearly state that if Collingwood had the extra
> $ &
> > > > > assistance that the Brions have had over the past few years, we too
> > > would
> > > > > have won at least 2 flags by now! But when we win one it wont be as
> > > > > concession card holders.
> > > >
> > > > How did Collingwood come by Jason Cloke, Rhyce Shaw and several others
> > > > on their list Larry?
> > > >
> > > > And before you say it Jobe Watson at Essendon.
> > >
> > > Slight difference dude. The Father/son rule applies evenly to ALL clubs.
> The
> > > concessions only apply to a select few like the Brions.
> > >
> > > Lazza
> >
> > The father/son rule applies to all clubs, but favours some clubs far more
> than
> > others.  They should chuck it out.
> >
> > deker19
>
> The Father/son rule has been there for many years with nearly every club
> benefiting. Even the Brions benefited with Brown. Different to the pissy
> bloody $concession cards that are given out to only a select few! YOU now
> tell me which one is equitable dude?

Strange.  You appear to be happy with "nearly" every club benefitting.
So you're happy to accept a situation like this, hey?  Well, to answer
your question... both are equitable to those teams that benefit - and
both are inequitable to those teams that don't benefit.  Simple, really.

deker19