
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:56:40 +1000, "JohnD." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >"Larry de Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> Look dude I was having a serious discussion with you > >No you weren't. You were harping on about the consessions that the Lions >receive but were unwilling to expand the subject to "unfair concessions as >they favour any team". Sure, you side got flogged by Brisbane BUT you cannot >deny that Collingwood received considerable help to get there in the first >place. Even the most one-eyed Collingwood supporter wouldn't claim to >support the league's second best team. why don't you go ahead and tell us who is then? (and why Collingwood beat them - woops forgot it probably Hawthorn isn't it? > >> but looks like you have >> only a secret agenda to discredit the 'pies. > >Reflecting on the draw they had does that quite nicely ... that and their >own performance when it counted. > > >> OR you cant read. I have said >> that it is IMPOSSIBLE to have an equitable comp > >Well that's one opinion. Bit hard to retreat to that position and still >whinge about the consessions that Brisbane receives though. Why don't you >expand your horizons a little and try to identify ALL the concessions that >some teams receive when compared to the treatment that other clubs endure. > >> WHO cares about >> draws for Collingwood or the other teams when come September > >Supporters of teams that do not profit from the same inequity perhaps ? >The other clubs themselves perhaps ? > >Certainly not Collingwood supporters, if you are any indication. Not at all >interested in looking on your side of the fence ... instead you just wanna >bitch about the unfairness of it all without acknowledging half the bloody >unfairness. > >> , it all becomes >> totally bloody irrelevant when playing the Brions? No other team would >have >> beaten the Brion's last Sat. Not a snowballs hope in hell. > >The pea-hearted Pies certainly made them look good. >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |