Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Research Project



[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Seamus) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> 
> -Refs? Answer this: refs, or honor.  personal integrity.  "But the
> other guy's gonna cheat..." Bull.  Fucking. Shit.  I would not play on
> the same team as a 'cheater' and i challenge you to find one team in
> the nation without players who feel as strongly.  SOTG is THE
> fundamental precept of the sport- on par with the disc itself.  Bring
> in refs, and you're just playing football for skinny, hyperactive
> guys.
> 

Is it possible that in the heat of 'battle' either or both players
involved in a called foul might not actually know what really
happened? As a spectator, I sometimes have that feeling. I wonder how
a player who has jumped high to catch the disc can possibly always
know where his/her foot came down first. Or whether the defender had
contact prior to missing a catch. I'm not so sure that observers mean
SOTG is dead.

As a spectator, I would prefer that the call be made by an observer
rather than always go back. I would also expect an observer to 'pass'
on the call if they did not see the play clearly enough.



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.