
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (crayon) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robin Bauer) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (judd) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robin Bauer) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > > > > First of all, welcome back from the dead, Robin. > > > > > > > Many changes are needed: > > > > > > > > 1 - name change, ULTIMATE just won't cut it. It is a very lame name > > > > for our great sport > > > > 2 - refs are needed, a mainstream sport without refs just won't work. > > > > 3 - need to speed up the game. I am not very familiar with the > > > > college rules but it sounds like they do good job of eliminating > > > > downtime. > > > > > > I could live with these changes, I mean if some marketing gurus and > > > experts determined this would work. > > > > > > > 4 - make Zond D illegal. Reason being - it slows down the game and is > > > > usually very boring to watch. Thus it should be banned. > > > > > > Is soccer boring? Golf? What makes boring.... boring? If it's the > > > basketball/football crowd you're trying to attract, then maybe zone is > > > boring, I don't know. But zone D is just an organized form of > > > poaching, more or less. How would you regulate poaching and when > > > would it be considered a zone? That would seem difficult to separate, > > > because you don't want all poaching do be illegal (do you?), yet too > > > much of it may fit into a definition of zone. > > > > Poaching is great and not banned in any sport that I know of. > > Poaching was still legal in the NBA when zones were not legal. By > > boring I mean that zone slows the game down and takes away some of the > > sports athleticism. I think there are far fewer great plays made on O > > and D when people are playing zone. I think we could take the lead on > > this one and prevent ways of slowing down the game, unlike the major > > sports do. Basketball and soccer can both get very, very boring near > > the end of the game due to coaches being able to slow down the game, > > as can football if the team has the ball and they have the lead. > > Let's try to prevent this "slowing down" in Ultimate (flatball) and I > > think we can start with the zone. It would be simple to make some > > rules that will prevent zoning and still allow for poaching. > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) What kind of influence would major sports fans bring? > > > > > > > > don't think they'd bring influence, they would just have to become > > > > educated. > > > > > > I think major sports fans would bring people from different > > > backgrounds in who want to play. > > i think you're looking at this the wrong way. no one has the kind of > dedication to a sport that makes it really truly popular because they > find the sport compelling in every aspect. that's unrealistic. > baseball, compared to, say, soccer is the most boring thing on the > planet. soccer can get tiresome at times, but it is popular because a > billion people in the world are crazy about it. trying to tweak > ultimate will not cause execs at espn to shout "hell, they got rid of > that stupid, awful zone d, let's put ultimate in the rotation guys." > that's just unrealistic. are you suggesting to just stand by, do nothing, and hope the sport becomes more popular by some twist of fate? I think we're just talking about being proactive, my ideas may be wrong, but I think changes are needed to advance this sport and maybe a sport exec might go hey - that's a great sport. Not because there's no zone, but because some type of change was made making the sport more entertaining, more public friendly.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |