
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (judd) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Professor Funk) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > I always found indoor Ultimate to be satisfying. It's far from > boring, at least. Every point is like a fast break, a lot of > give-and-go, although sometimes with ridiculous poaching. Preferably > played with a minimum number of throws BEFORE one can score. Then > again, having no limit on number of throws would really make one a > responsible defender. It usually satisfied the competetive bug until > Spring. 'Course you could always just soak in a jacuzzi and see how > many points you can play outside... I also enjoy the indoor game and my team has productive practices over the winter. To minimize poaching try playing 3 on 3. That would simulate handling and defending handlers in a split stack offence. But that would not be quite realistic because you would normally get a lot of help or a switch on a deep cut. Therefore limit the maximum length of a pass by dividing the field into 3 zones, you can not pass more than the next zone forward. Also we usually disallow hammers indoors. To make it a good workout we often play make it you take it, with only a check in between points. Really makes you want to play defence with the make it take it rule. ,Bob Koca
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |