
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I'm doing a research project in one of my classes this quarter and the > main subject is Ultimate and wether or not it would work/fit in as a > major mainstream sport in the U.S. Half of my project involves the > opinions of ultimate players and those in the ultimate community and > i'd appreciate anyone giving their two cents in response to my > questions. > > 1) Would ultimate work as a mainstream (NCAA/Pro, on TV, pay to > attend) sport in America? Yes, it should, the athleticism needed to throw, catch and make d-blocks is equal to and greater than many mainstream sports > > If Yes: 2) Would the players/rules(especially > observers/refs)/anything be different than it is today. Many changes are needed: 1 - name change, ULTIMATE just won't cut it. It is a very lame name for our great sport 2 - refs are needed, a mainstream sport without refs just won't work. 3 - need to speed up the game. I am not very familiar with the college rules but it sounds like they do good job of eliminating downtime. 4 - make Zond D illegal. Reason being - it slows down the game and is usually very boring to watch. Thus it should be banned. > 3) What kind of influence would major sports fans bring? don't think they'd bring influence, they would just have to become educated. > > If No: 2) Why not? > 3) What changes would need to be made to make it work? > > 4) If it did happen and ultimate became a major sport in America, > would you still take as large a part in it as you do now? Even more so! > > Thanks for all who respond, > > Nick Gramly > OSU Leadbelly
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |