
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I'm doing a research project in one of my classes this quarter and the > main subject is Ultimate and wether or not it would work/fit in as a > major mainstream sport in the U.S. Half of my project involves the > opinions of ultimate players and those in the ultimate community and > i'd appreciate anyone giving their two cents in response to my > questions. > > 1) Would ultimate work as a mainstream (NCAA/Pro, on TV, pay to > attend) sport in America? > > If Yes: 2) Would the players/rules(especially > observers/refs)/anything be different than it is today. > 3) What kind of influence would major sports fans bring? > > If No: 2) Why not? > 3) What changes would need to be made to make it work? > > 4) If it did happen and ultimate became a major sport in America, > would you still take as large a part in it as you do now? > > Thanks for all who respond, > > Nick Gramly > OSU Leadbelly 1. No. 2. The American sports culture (reverence of sports, emotional attachment to sports) has been hegemonic for the most part in its choice of which sports to cover since the 1930's (coincidentally the end of the period of industrialization in America) and no sports have experienced popular reverence on the level of the established sports in American sports culture (baseball, basketball, american football, and hockey to a degree). Ultimate's success in the American mainstream market would not be conditional upon participant numbers in the short-term; billiards and fishing by themselves count more participants than the National Basketball Association. The difference is the culture surrounding the two groups of sports: watercooler talk, media praise, adoration, and coverage, college money, sponsorship on an economically significant level, et cetera. If our participant numbers reach the hundreds of thousands, college teams recruit ceaselessly, and every city in America has an active league, Ultimate will still only get a nod to the side by media outlets and mass venues, if that, at least for a time. Of course, if participation in Ultimate reaches numbers that are just silly, one of the more accepted sports will be pushed aside into history and Ultimate will take over, but that will take time and numbers that we don't have. Furthermore, the sports that currently dominate the American sports culture have the aid of mechanisms to stregnthen their own positions and weaken the threat of entrance from "niche" sports: dominance of television coverage, a system of education that furthers the predominance of the Big Four, and entrenchment in American popular culture. 3. The sport itself is fine; changing Ultimate will not aid or bring about recognition in the NCAA, on ESPN, or in the popular culture of America. The only thing that will get it into the spotlight in a timely fashion would be ridiculous growth figures or maybe the anihilation of baseball players and fans en masse by the Ultimate community. Otherwise, the hope of Ultimate players worldwide to entrench themselves in sports culture and enjoy the popularity of more accepted sports is in vain; sports culture in America won't accept anything new until the market mechanisms entrenching the current sports are slighted by unparallelled growth in another sport and its entrenchment in popular culture (that will be the hard part). 4. I would in a second take a much larger role in this sport if it was instantly as large as football. I guess I'm just pessimistic, but sorry Mike G., I think Wednesday Night College Ultimate is still a long way away. Of course the Observer's orange might look good with gray hair.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |